Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel-needs-external-foundry-customers-to-make-14a-process-node-pay-off.22902/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel needs external foundry customers to make 14A process node pay off

Fred Chen

Moderator

Ailing chip giant targets 2027 break-even as costly EUV tools raise stakes​

Dan Robinson
Wed 14 May 2025 // 17:20 UTC

Intel is wooing external chip customers for its 14A process node to justify the high costs involved, and aims for the foundry division to break even by 2027 - as part of ongoing effort to shake off the struggles of recent years.

Speaking at the JP Morgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference this week in Boston, Massachusetts, Intel chief financial officer David Zinsner said the upcoming 18A manufacturing process will be mainly used for the company's own products, but that its successor, 14A, would be a different matter.

"The first 18A customer is going to be Intel Products," Zinsner told the audience. "Yeah, it's Panther Lake, and the first SKU is expected to be out by the end of the year. So, it is our first win, so to speak, if you put on the Intel Foundry hat with 18A."

The chipmaker "always expected" the predominant volume of 18A was going to be internal, he claimed, and it doesn't need much external business to fill in the gaps to make 18A a good node from a value perspective.

"I feel actually pretty good about our ability to drive a reasonable return on 18A," Zinsner said, while 14A "obviously gets more expensive."

"At present, it's expected to have High NA, and, you know, that's a more expensive tool," Zinsner said. "So, you know, I think we do need to see more external volume come from 14A versus 18A," he stated, referring to the most advanced extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines used in chip manufacturing, of which Intel has procured at least two from Netherlands-based ASML. The "high NA" prefix is to do with higher numerical aperture (NA), and thus better resolution, in the newer ASML optical systems.

Asked when Intel's foundry biz, which it split off into a separate business unit under the Intel brand last year, will start making a profit, Zinsner would only say that the break-even point was likely to come in 2027.

"We still feel on track to hit break-even sometime in 2027. You know, I think when we committed to it in '24, we said, hey. It's gonna be somewhere between '24 and 2030, and most people kind of settled in that that must mean '27, and that's generally kind of what we're thinking is when we can be break-even," he added.

This wouldn't require it to make a huge amount of revenue, he claimed, saying: "It's somewhere in the, you know, low to mid-single digit billions of revenue that Foundry's got to get from external sources. But I would just remind you that some of that's going to be our partnership with UMC, some of that's going to be our partnership with Tower, some of that's gonna be packaging, and some of that's going to be 18A, some of that actually is gonna be older generations, like Intel 16. So it's not a ton that has to come from 18A for it to work."

Zinsner also disclosed that since the global supply chain issues experienced during the COVID pandemic, many customers are seeking a second source for the silicon chips they have made, and Intel Foundry could be the ideal candidate.

"I hear customers wanting to have a second source, it doesn't mean that the competitors or the largest competitor won't get every bit of share that they want, but I think there's always a requirement for a second source in these cases, and that's the opportunity and that's the area we want to fill," he said.

Even Intel itself uses other chip manufacturers – chiefly TSMC – where necessary.

"I would tell you that we will have a fair amount of volume at external foundries, you know, mainly TSMC on a go-forward basis. You know, Products has some latitude as to how they design products. We go through all of that as a team, and of course we want to see a fair amount of the volume come from Intel Foundry, but we also recognize there are unique situations and performance requirements that would drive you to another source of the wafer," he explained.

"We want that because we want to drive the best products ultimately for our customers, and we also feel like it's a healthy dynamic to have Foundry feel like it's competing for every wafer with Intel Products, and, you know, I think that drives better performance out of Intel Foundry as well."

Intel's CFO also had high praise for his new boss, chief exec Lip-Bu Tan, appointed in March, for his efforts to turn around the ailing chip giant.

"I think it's a fair assessment that Lip-Bu isn't thinking about massive changes. I think, you know, when he looks at the business, what he feels is the biggest issue at this point is a lack of execution," Zinsner told the audience.

"He is attacking that in a number of different ways. He is really flattening the organization, and he's already done that at the executive team level. I mean, he's up to like 15, 17 direct reports. He's got a lot more engineering leaders reporting directly to him as opposed to having an intermediary report between them.

"I think this flattening the organization is important to him because what he wants is the lowest level in the organization to be closer to him, so that he's hearing the good, the bad, the ugly of what's going on so that he can help address those. And I think through that, I think we'll see a lot of improvement in terms of the execution."

In terms of execution, Intel has already flattened the careers of many employees, with recent reports suggesting the firm has further plans to shed up to 20 percent of its current workforce, or around 20,000 people.

This comes on top of the roughly 15 percent of staff it lost in August, followed by other layoffs that have seen the chipmaker left with a headcount of 102,600 as of last month. ®

 
Kind of expected considering how expensive optional High-NA is going to be and how expensive modern Leading Node R&D has become the question is who is going to be the 🐋 except Intel products.
 
I wish they would stop calling Intel the "ailing chip giant" and this author knows nothing about semiconductors. The media sure is pessimistic of late. I guess that type of nonsense gets clicks and wow, the amount of ads on these articles.
Intel is loosing money rn so they are not doing so well financially.
 
Last edited:
I wish they would stop calling Intel the "ailing chip giant" and this author knows nothing about semiconductors. The media sure is pessimistic of late. I guess that type of nonsense gets clicks and wow, the amount of ads on these articles.
Agree 100%. Though Intel needs to do something inspiring:

1748345001968.png
 
Kind of expected considering how expensive optional High-NA is going to be and how expensive modern Leading Node R&D has become the question is who is going to be the 🐋 except Intel products.

It would've been much better, if we had no "whales".

While, finance-wise within a single company, its an undoubtedly a winning choice short-term, long term it's an extremely high risk for one company, and a tragedy for the industry.

Everything went into an all-in bet on the few extremely imprudent, but extremely wealthy clients ready to pay "any" money, rather than continuing the long-term winning cost leadership. If one such "whale" drops out on its own volition, downturn, or, if something happens to it, the entire industry will take a giant hit.

All such clients are led by insubstantial personalities, very whimsical, who are ready to drop, and not to drop billion dollar projects based on what they read in newspapers that day.
 

Ailing chip giant targets 2027 break-even as costly EUV tools raise stakes​

Dan Robinson
Wed 14 May 2025 // 17:20 UTC

Intel is wooing external chip customers for its 14A process node to justify the high costs involved, and aims for the foundry division to break even by 2027 - as part of ongoing effort to shake off the struggles of recent years.

Speaking at the JP Morgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference this week in Boston, Massachusetts, Intel chief financial officer David Zinsner said the upcoming 18A manufacturing process will be mainly used for the company's own products, but that its successor, 14A, would be a different matter.

"The first 18A customer is going to be Intel Products," Zinsner told the audience. "Yeah, it's Panther Lake, and the first SKU is expected to be out by the end of the year. So, it is our first win, so to speak, if you put on the Intel Foundry hat with 18A."

The chipmaker "always expected" the predominant volume of 18A was going to be internal, he claimed, and it doesn't need much external business to fill in the gaps to make 18A a good node from a value perspective.

"I feel actually pretty good about our ability to drive a reasonable return on 18A," Zinsner said, while 14A "obviously gets more expensive."

"At present, it's expected to have High NA, and, you know, that's a more expensive tool," Zinsner said. "So, you know, I think we do need to see more external volume come from 14A versus 18A," he stated, referring to the most advanced extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines used in chip manufacturing, of which Intel has procured at least two from Netherlands-based ASML. The "high NA" prefix is to do with higher numerical aperture (NA), and thus better resolution, in the newer ASML optical systems.

Asked when Intel's foundry biz, which it split off into a separate business unit under the Intel brand last year, will start making a profit, Zinsner would only say that the break-even point was likely to come in 2027.

"We still feel on track to hit break-even sometime in 2027. You know, I think when we committed to it in '24, we said, hey. It's gonna be somewhere between '24 and 2030, and most people kind of settled in that that must mean '27, and that's generally kind of what we're thinking is when we can be break-even," he added.

This wouldn't require it to make a huge amount of revenue, he claimed, saying: "It's somewhere in the, you know, low to mid-single digit billions of revenue that Foundry's got to get from external sources. But I would just remind you that some of that's going to be our partnership with UMC, some of that's going to be our partnership with Tower, some of that's gonna be packaging, and some of that's going to be 18A, some of that actually is gonna be older generations, like Intel 16. So it's not a ton that has to come from 18A for it to work."

Zinsner also disclosed that since the global supply chain issues experienced during the COVID pandemic, many customers are seeking a second source for the silicon chips they have made, and Intel Foundry could be the ideal candidate.

"I hear customers wanting to have a second source, it doesn't mean that the competitors or the largest competitor won't get every bit of share that they want, but I think there's always a requirement for a second source in these cases, and that's the opportunity and that's the area we want to fill," he said.

Even Intel itself uses other chip manufacturers – chiefly TSMC – where necessary.

"I would tell you that we will have a fair amount of volume at external foundries, you know, mainly TSMC on a go-forward basis. You know, Products has some latitude as to how they design products. We go through all of that as a team, and of course we want to see a fair amount of the volume come from Intel Foundry, but we also recognize there are unique situations and performance requirements that would drive you to another source of the wafer," he explained.

"We want that because we want to drive the best products ultimately for our customers, and we also feel like it's a healthy dynamic to have Foundry feel like it's competing for every wafer with Intel Products, and, you know, I think that drives better performance out of Intel Foundry as well."

Intel's CFO also had high praise for his new boss, chief exec Lip-Bu Tan, appointed in March, for his efforts to turn around the ailing chip giant.

"I think it's a fair assessment that Lip-Bu isn't thinking about massive changes. I think, you know, when he looks at the business, what he feels is the biggest issue at this point is a lack of execution," Zinsner told the audience.

"He is attacking that in a number of different ways. He is really flattening the organization, and he's already done that at the executive team level. I mean, he's up to like 15, 17 direct reports. He's got a lot more engineering leaders reporting directly to him as opposed to having an intermediary report between them.

"I think this flattening the organization is important to him because what he wants is the lowest level in the organization to be closer to him, so that he's hearing the good, the bad, the ugly of what's going on so that he can help address those. And I think through that, I think we'll see a lot of improvement in terms of the execution."

In terms of execution, Intel has already flattened the careers of many employees, with recent reports suggesting the firm has further plans to shed up to 20 percent of its current workforce, or around 20,000 people.

This comes on top of the roughly 15 percent of staff it lost in August, followed by other layoffs that have seen the chipmaker left with a headcount of 102,600 as of last month. ®


In order to acquire external customers, Intel has spent and will continue to spend a significant amount of capital. I’ve heard the rationale is that external customers can bring volume to Intel Foundry and consequently improve its economies of scale.

However, I wonder if there are any Intel or third-party estimates on the minimum volume needed from external customers to achieve those goals. If that number can’t be clearly defined, then I would argue this is more wishful thinking than sound strategy, potentially worse than not pursuing external customers at all.
 
In order to acquire external customers, Intel has spent and will continue to spend a significant amount of capital. I’ve heard the rationale is that external customers can bring volume to Intel Foundry and consequently improve its economies of scale.

However, I wonder if there are any Intel or third-party estimates on the minimum volume needed from external customers to achieve those goals. If that number can’t be clearly defined, then I would argue this is more wishful thinking than sound strategy, potentially worse than not pursuing external customers at all.
I would say Intel has the numbers but they won't disclose it they know the number with 18A break even they must know the number with 14A breakeven.
 
In order to acquire external customers, Intel has spent and will continue to spend a significant amount of capital. I’ve heard the rationale is that external customers can bring volume to Intel Foundry and consequently improve its economies of scale.

However, I wonder if there are any Intel or third-party estimates on the minimum volume needed from external customers to achieve those goals. If that number can’t be clearly defined, then I would argue this is more wishful thinking than sound strategy, potentially worse than not pursuing external customers at all.

Intel needs external customers if they want to continue in the manufacturing business. The big reason why TSMC is moving so fast is that they have external customers and partners collaborating and pushing them to build cheaper wafers with better PPA. Remember, TSMC is not a semiconductor design expert but their customers and partners are. Intel grew up in a technology silo and that will no longer work. Intel Foundry really is the future of Intel manufacturing.

I'm sure the design side of Intel is great but they will be against AMD and TSMC or NVDIA and TSMC or Qualcomm and TSMC. Maybe Lip-Bu can form a close partnership between Intel and TSMC but without manufacturing I doubt Lip-Bu will stay CEO of Intel.

The top semiconductor companies are run by some very smart people and I'm sure in the back of their minds they know how important Intel Foundry is. 14A will be the true test. If the top 10 do not partner with Intel Foundry there will only be one leading edge (AI) foundry moving forward and that puts a huge amount of risk on the company balance sheet. Jensen Huang, Lisa Hsu, Hock Tan, Cristiano Aman, Matt Murphy, Tim Cook, and the AI cloud leaders (OCI, GCP, AWS, Azure) need to put their wafers where there mouth is. Monopolies are bad. Competition is good. Have we learned nothing from the fall of Intel?
 
Back
Top