Then why they all still use Cadence rips from 10 years ago without a fail?
Array
(
[content] =>
[params] => Array
(
[0] => /forum/threads/us-restricts-chip-design-software-sales-to-china.22921/page-3
)
[addOns] => Array
(
[DL6/MLTP] => 13
[Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
[SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
[SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
[ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
[ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
[XF] => 2021770
[XFI] => 1050270
)
[wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
Guests have limited access.
Join our community today!
Join our community today!
You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
US restricts chip design software sales to China
- Thread starter Daniel Nenni
- Start date
Then why they all still use Cadence rips from 10 years ago without a fail?
Not sure what you mean.Then why they all still use Cadence rips from 10 years ago without a fail?
Most chinese companies are still using 90-45nm node, EDA tools from 10 years ago are sufficient..
But for companies like Huawei/xiaomi, new EDA tools are essential.
Because $10K is still a lot of money for something without warranty!!Then why they all still use Cadence rips from 10 years ago without a fail?
Seriously, if the number of design houses in China is more than the combined total of the rest of the world, then why is the Synopsys and Cadence China revenue less than 20% of total!