Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel-will-outsource-marketing-to-accenture-and-ai-laying-off-many-of-its-own-workers.23069/page-2
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel will outsource marketing to Accenture and AI, laying off many of its own workers

I don't think it is particular hard to do. You first need to understand the tasks that Intel used to carry. Then automate according to tasks. Accenture does not need to do everything. It can rely on salesforce and various other agents to make it work.

The objective is to reduce number of headcounts, not really about full automation.

I am sure Accenture has already done similar things for other companies.

You mention Saleforce , another drain on companies resources.

Sounds like Intel gonna be paying out of money to folk doing very little
 
I believe AI has a clear advantage in marketing: transparency. It's like a game of chicken where the opponent is an AI that never chickens.
JD.com once revolutionized China's PC market by making prices fully transparent, effectively eliminating nearly half of the country's PC s.
 
Are you also saying the management is stupid?

I believe Intel management was shackled by unnecessary layers and processes. This is my personal experience working with Intel on different projects over the years. I also remember renegade Intel groups that really got stuff done but disappeared as time went on. Lip-Bu has said the same, management layers will be reduced and decision makers will be held accountable. Will that be enough to get Intel back into a leadership opinion? I hope so but time will tell.
 
I believe AI has a clear advantage in marketing: transparency. It's like a game of chicken where the opponent is an AI that never chickens.
JD.com once revolutionized China's PC market by making prices fully transparent, effectively eliminating nearly half of the country's PC s.
As long as it doesn't hallucinates and promise feature that doesn't exists 🤣
 
As long as it doesn't hallucinates and promise feature that doesn't exists 🤣

I use ChatGPT most days for research and fact checking. ChatGPT is also integrated into SemiWiki for content summaries and SEO. Since I have a proper semiconductor education and experience I have found it to be a useful tool. The first year I did see questionable results but it has improved significantly. It is important that you keep an eye out for misinformation and the questions and follow-up questions you ask are key because it can take you down a rabbit hole if you are not careful.

Bottom line: In the hands of knowledgeable person AI is very useful today and will continue improve. Intel has skilled marketing people that will be working with Accenture so I see this as a big positive. In fact, I would expect AMD and other companies to follow suit if they haven't already because at some point AI will provide a critical business advantage and you do not want to be on the tail end of that.

Sound reasonable?
 
Tom's Hardware
Intel to outsource marketing to Accenture and AI, resulting in more layoffs
Anton Shilov

Who makes up these titles? Actually, the layoffs were due to a bloated and ineffective marketing group. Word to the wise, do your job or AI will do it for you.
 
Question -- What is the actual scope of Intel "marketing"?

Is it:
- Branding materials only
- Does it include B2C *and* B2B?
- Is there any overlap between sales and marketing at Intel? (some companies have blurred lines here). What is the overlap?
- Does it include Foundry and Products?

And lastly - was the marketing group laid off .. global marketing? Does Intel have any other marketing groups that are not impacted?
 
Nonetheless, I think outsourcing marketing is a weird idea. Not that I'm arguing that Intel marketing didn't need a weight-loss program, I think it did, but the notion of out-sourcing your corporate communications to a bunch of consultants with only indirect skin in the game is questionable.
I agree. Good and effective marketing needs deep insight into the ongoing production, but also research and development and I'm not sure if Intel's "close to their chest / this is all confidential IP" secrecy is willing to share those insights. Very questionable move.
 
Question -- What is the actual scope of Intel "marketing"?

Is it:
- Branding materials only
- Does it include B2C *and* B2B?
- Is there any overlap between sales and marketing at Intel? (some companies have blurred lines here). What is the overlap?
- Does it include Foundry and Products?

And lastly - was the marketing group laid off .. global marketing? Does Intel have any other marketing groups that are not impacted?
Historically, "marketing" at Intel has many very different areas.
Technical marketing (and Field application engineers) and strategic marketing are part of Business unit and would be difficult to outsource.
Branding, advertising marketing, campaigns is more tied to sales.

this organization was disputed even 10-20 years ago about who controls what and what is the scope. I would guess the hit will be on SMG type people.

I would expect this would be the type of thing LBT would completely overhaul since it has historically seemed to have redundancies and inefficiencies.
 
Back
Top