Daniel Payne
Moderator
[table] align="center" style="width: 800px"
|-
| align="left" valign="top" style="width: 25px" |
| width="750" align="left" valign="top" | Each quarter, the EDA Consortium publishes the Market Statistics Service (MSS) report containing detailed revenue data for the EDA industry. The report compiles data submitted confidentially by both public and private EDA companies into tables and charts listing the data by both EDA category and geographic region. This newsletter highlights the results for the second quarter of 2011. Additional details are available in the press release, or by subscribing to the EDA Consortium MSS report.
Overall, second quarter 2011 EDA revenues increased 17.6% compared to the same period in 2010. Total revenue for Q2 was $1438.1 million. Figures 1 and 2, below, summarize the revenue growth for Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010, detailed by category (figure 1) and geographic region (figure 2). The MSS report contains many additional sub-categories, allowing subscribers to perform a more detailed analysis of revenues affecting their business. A complete list of categories for 2011 is available here.
[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" style="width: 375px; width: 375px" |
| align="center" valign="top" style="width: 375px; width: 375px" |
|-
| align="center" valign="top" |
| align="center" valign="top" |
|-
[/table]
Tables 1 and 2, below, show the percentage growth for the EDA industry by major category and region. (Negative growth is listed in parentheses).
[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" style="width: 375px; width: 375px" | [table] align="center" style="width: 350px"
|-
| align="left" valign="bottom" style="width: 150px; width: 150px" | Category
| align="center" valign="bottom" style="width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px" |
| width="75" align="center" valign="bottom" |
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | CAE
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 549.8
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 19.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | IC Physical Design & Verification
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 286.9
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 5.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | PCB & MCM
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 144.9
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 21.7
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | SIP
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 367.7
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 22.6
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | Services
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 88.8
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 19.9
|-
[/table]
| width="375" align="center" valign="top" | [table] align="center" style="width: 350px"
|-
| align="left" valign="bottom" style="width: 150px; width: 150px" | Region
| align="center" valign="bottom" style="width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px" |
| width="75" align="center" valign="bottom" |
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | Americas
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 626.1
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 21.1
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | EMEA
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 246.5
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 8.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | Japan
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 253.9
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 17.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | APAC
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 311.6
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 18.1
|-
| align="left" valign="middle" |
| align="right" valign="middle" |
| align="right" valign="middle" |
|-
[/table]
|-
| align="center" valign="top" | Table 1: Q2 2011 EDA revenue growth by category
| align="center" valign="top" | Table 2: Q2 2011 EDA revenue growth by region
|-
[/table]
Figure3 (below) shows the EDA revenue percentages by major category. As the chart shows, CAE remains the largest category, followed by Semiconductor IP and IC Design and Verification tools. Geographically, the Americas is the largest consumer of EDA tools, with the remainder divided amongst Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA), Japan, and Asia Pacific (APAC), as shown in Figure 4. The quarterly MSS report includes additional details for the Asia Pacific region.
[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" |
| align="center" valign="top" |
|-
| align="center" valign="top" | Figure 3: Q2 2011 EDA revenue percentage by category
| align="center" valign="top" | Figure 4: Q2 2011 EDA revenue percentage by region
|-
[/table]
Figure 5 shows the historical EDA revenue ...[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" |
|-
[/table]
| width="25" align="left" valign="top" |
|-
[/table]
|-
| align="left" valign="top" style="width: 25px" |
| width="750" align="left" valign="top" | Each quarter, the EDA Consortium publishes the Market Statistics Service (MSS) report containing detailed revenue data for the EDA industry. The report compiles data submitted confidentially by both public and private EDA companies into tables and charts listing the data by both EDA category and geographic region. This newsletter highlights the results for the second quarter of 2011. Additional details are available in the press release, or by subscribing to the EDA Consortium MSS report.
Overall, second quarter 2011 EDA revenues increased 17.6% compared to the same period in 2010. Total revenue for Q2 was $1438.1 million. Figures 1 and 2, below, summarize the revenue growth for Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010, detailed by category (figure 1) and geographic region (figure 2). The MSS report contains many additional sub-categories, allowing subscribers to perform a more detailed analysis of revenues affecting their business. A complete list of categories for 2011 is available here.
[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" style="width: 375px; width: 375px" |
| align="center" valign="top" style="width: 375px; width: 375px" |
|-
| align="center" valign="top" |
Figure 1: Q2 2011 EDA revenue growth by category
| align="center" valign="top" |
Figure 2: Q2 2011 EDA revenue growth by region
|-
[/table]
Tables 1 and 2, below, show the percentage growth for the EDA industry by major category and region. (Negative growth is listed in parentheses).
[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" style="width: 375px; width: 375px" | [table] align="center" style="width: 350px"
|-
| align="left" valign="bottom" style="width: 150px; width: 150px" | Category
| align="center" valign="bottom" style="width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px" |
Revenue
($ Millions)
($ Millions)
| width="75" align="center" valign="bottom" |
% Change
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | CAE
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 549.8
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 19.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | IC Physical Design & Verification
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 286.9
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 5.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | PCB & MCM
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 144.9
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 21.7
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | SIP
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 367.7
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 22.6
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | Services
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 88.8
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 19.9
|-
[/table]
| width="375" align="center" valign="top" | [table] align="center" style="width: 350px"
|-
| align="left" valign="bottom" style="width: 150px; width: 150px" | Region
| align="center" valign="bottom" style="width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px; width: 75px" |
Revenue
($ Millions)
($ Millions)
| width="75" align="center" valign="bottom" |
% Change
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | Americas
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 626.1
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 21.1
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | EMEA
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 246.5
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 8.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | Japan
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 253.9
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 17.8
|-
| width="150" align="left" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | APAC
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 311.6
| width="75" align="right" valign="middle" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt" | 18.1
|-
| align="left" valign="middle" |
| align="right" valign="middle" |
| align="right" valign="middle" |
|-
[/table]
|-
| align="center" valign="top" | Table 1: Q2 2011 EDA revenue growth by category
| align="center" valign="top" | Table 2: Q2 2011 EDA revenue growth by region
|-
[/table]
Figure3 (below) shows the EDA revenue percentages by major category. As the chart shows, CAE remains the largest category, followed by Semiconductor IP and IC Design and Verification tools. Geographically, the Americas is the largest consumer of EDA tools, with the remainder divided amongst Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA), Japan, and Asia Pacific (APAC), as shown in Figure 4. The quarterly MSS report includes additional details for the Asia Pacific region.
[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" |
| align="center" valign="top" |
|-
| align="center" valign="top" | Figure 3: Q2 2011 EDA revenue percentage by category
| align="center" valign="top" | Figure 4: Q2 2011 EDA revenue percentage by region
|-
[/table]
Figure 5 shows the historical EDA revenue ...[table] style="width: 750px"
|-
| align="center" valign="top" |
Figure 5: EDA revenue history, 1996 - present
|-
[/table]
| width="25" align="left" valign="top" |
|-
[/table]