Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/tsmc-and-asml-will-litho-tools-be-able-to-keep-pace-with-ai-super-cycle-investments-till-2030.24610/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030970
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

TSMC and ASML: will #litho tools be able to keep pace with AI super cycle investments till 2030?

user nl

Well-known member
Question for this audience:

since the start of EUV in HVM around 2018 TSMC has typically invested >35% of annual revenue on capex, see this graph:
1771949131223.png


TSMC has (conservatively) predicted a CAGR of 25% till 2029, let's assume this will go all the way to 2030. This means TSMC revenue in 2030 will be (1.25)^5*122 B$ = 372 B$

If we assume TSMC will only spend 30% capex (so quite conservative) in 2030 TSMC will spend 0.3 * 372 = 112 B$ in capex in 2030.

TSMC capex is kind of linked to ASML's revenue and if you look at the ratio (ASML-revenue-in US$) / TSMS-capex since the start of EUV litho in HVM around 2019 we see:

1771950410058.png


Assume ASML will have a similar ratio to TSMC capex in 2030 it means ASML revenue is predicted to be about 0.86*112= 96 US$ ~ 96/1.17 ~ 80 BEuro in 2030.

ASML still predicts their revenue in 2030 will be between 44-60 B Euro. Their upperbound is way below the TSMC capex predicted revenue.

Will ASML-litho tools become a bottle neck for filling all the new fabs of TSMC and all the memory producers (for HBM) till 2030?
Any ideas?
 
Back
Top