Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/half-of-americans-fear-ai-could-put-someone-in-their-household-out-of-work-reuters-ipsos-poll-finds.25282/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2031070
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Half of Americans fear AI could put someone in their household out of work, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Daniel Nenni

Founder
Staff member
1781109719323.png


WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - Half of Americans fear that the rise of AI could put them or someone in their household out of work, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll that also showed widespread angst ‌at how widely the technology is being adopted.

The six-day survey, completed on Monday, found that 53% of Americans shared that worry, ‌which was spread fairly evenly across respondents by age, gender and education level.

Some 37% of respondents said they did not worry about this at all with the remaining 10% either unsure or opting not to answer the question.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll followed a wave of AI-related job cuts by major companies including software firm Intuit, which told staff last month it would lay off 17% of its global workforce to streamline operations and sharpen focus on its key bets including its AI efforts. University of Arizona students booed Eric Schmidt last month when the former Google CEO discussed AI's impact at a graduation ceremony.

Its potential ‌use as a tool of political propaganda, in ⁠entertainment and even warfare has prompted warnings by elected leaders and even Pope Leo XIV.

Many of the announced job cuts have come at tech firms and it remains to be seen if the overall U.S. job market ⁠will suffer. The U.S. economy has posted strong job gains in recent months.

DEMOCRATS MORE WORRIED

Skepticism over AI runs higher among Democrats, whose party attracts more college graduates, than among Republicans, who have attracted more working-class voters since President Donald Trump's rise. Some 61% of Democrats said they worried about AI coming for jobs in their household, compared to 47% of Republicans.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 4,531 U.S. adults nationwide and its results had a margin of error ‌of 2 percentage points in either direction.

Jennifer Schalhoub, a 62-year-old freelance writer in Little Ferry, New Jersey, said she recently lost her job writing letters to government officials to advocate for specific policies, a loss that she suspects the rise of AI had a role in.

"AI is taking over because people care less and less about the quality of the work that gets produced," Schalhoub said.

Artificial intelligence burst onto the national stage in 2022 when OpenAI, a leading AI company, launched ChatGPT, a consumer-facing product that could answer user questions much as a human might and offered ‌a new way to search the Internet that posed an immediate threat to Google parent Alphabet.

Anthropic - another AI giant - has quickly gained traction with corporate clients, including through sales of computer coding assistant Claude Code. Both Anthropic and OpenAI have stirred major buzz on Wall Street with their plans to sell shares in their companies to ‌the public.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll found college graduates said they use AI more, with 50% saying they employ it regularly, compared to 34% of people without degrees and 40% of people overall.

Some 73% of Americans said they were worried about increased use of AI, a slightly higher share than the 68% who had that concern in a 2023 Reuters/Ipsos poll.

Lauren Hayes, a clinical psychologist in the state of Washington, ‌said she was concerned after a few of her clients told her they were consulting AI in between therapy sessions to help with anxiety.

"I don't believe that artificial intelligence is able to have the nuance that a person has," said Hayes.

 
AI is certainly making my life much easier, both personally and professionally. A serious time saver and will absolutely raise the IQ of the population. At least I certainly hope so.
I am seeing the inverse tbh it will degrade IQ considering what i am seeing in University or School People are skipping Homework or their stuff with AI. It will just force people to delegate their jobs to it. I wonder if it will reduce thinking skills and logical reasoning in People.
 
I am seeing the inverse tbh it will degrade IQ considering what i am seeing in University or School People are skipping Homework or their stuff with AI. It will just force people to delegate their jobs to it. I wonder if it will reduce thinking skills and logical reasoning in People.

What if its the grand plan of the "people running the world" to stupidify the public so they are forced to use/pay for some form of AI for absolutely everything in life.

Still will be good for the share price of some companies though , so all good no?
 
I am seeing the inverse tbh it will degrade IQ considering what i am seeing in University or School People are skipping Homework or their stuff with AI. It will just force people to delegate their jobs to it. I wonder if it will reduce thinking skills and logical reasoning in People.

I don't think this is a binary situation, as Daniel and probably others have said here. Some humans don't want to think (TikTok..), while others benefit from the tool immensely.

However, I don't see the long term economics behind AI - at least in it's current form. The investors are thinking it's going to print trillions of dollars, and soon. But, even the company with the largest clear workload benefit (Antrhopic Claude imo) is nowhere near break even. Corporations are starting to realize it's not providing the benefits they're expecting -- and some are already taking actions to reduce outlay on AI (while the AI providers need to raise rates to become profitable).

I can't predict if it'll be a temporary (a few years) or a long term disaster, but I personally don't see how a hard correction isn't coming soon in this space.
 
What if its the grand plan of the "people running the world" to stupidify the public so they are forced to use/pay for some form of AI for absolutely everything in life.

Still will be good for the share price of some companies though , so all good no?

There's a 1995 Carl Sagan quote for this --

“We’ve arranged a global civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces.”

..

That said, while individuals can be brilliant - I have yet to see a public that is such.
 
Back
Top