Semiwiki on LinkedIn Semiwiki on Facebook Semiwiki on Twitter Register / Log in 
Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/apple-to-spend-30-billion-on-broadcom-chips-as-it-boosts-us-sourcing.25474/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/EmailDomainReplace] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2031070
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Apple to spend $30 billion on Broadcom chips as it boosts US sourcing

Daniel Nenni

Daniel Nenni

Founder
Staff member
1783524235957.png


Apple’s planned $30 billion-plus chip-supply agreement with Broadcom marks a significant step in the company’s effort to localize more of its semiconductor supply chain in the United States. According to Reuters, the multi-year deal extends through 2031 and centers on U.S.-made wireless and radio-frequency components, including FBAR filters used to support connectivity functions in Apple devices such as 5G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and GPS.

From a technical-supply perspective, the agreement strengthens Apple’s access to specialized RF front-end components, which are critical for signal filtering, power efficiency and reliable wireless performance in compact consumer electronics. Broadcom will invest about $1.5 billion to expand its Fort Collins, Colorado facility, with the program expected to produce at least 15 billion chips.

The deal also reflects Apple’s broader strategy of diversifying semiconductor sourcing while increasing domestic manufacturing exposure. Although Apple’s most advanced application processors and memory components remain tied to global foundries and suppliers, RF chips are a practical category for U.S. capacity expansion because they rely on specialized manufacturing processes and long-term qualification cycles. Locking in supply through 2031 gives Apple greater control over component availability, reduces geopolitical and tariff-related risk, and supports closer collaboration with Broadcom on custom silicon requirements.

For Broadcom, the agreement deepens its role as a strategic Apple supplier and justifies capital investment in domestic capacity. For Apple, it is both a supply-chain resilience move and a policy-aligned investment in U.S. semiconductor production.

 
MKWVentures said:
so there is no change in where manufacturing is done, no onshoring, not even a vendor change.... correct?
Click to expand...
My understanding based on informal information channels, is that Apple is not happy about the Skyworks / Qorvo merger, and wants control over its RF designs just like it does its 5G modems. Broadcom has a major US RF fab, Skyworks has much lesser domestic fab capabilities, if any, for Apple products. A significant factor in the Broadcom deal is apparently a big expansion of the Colorado fab capacity. Also Broadcom has proven IP and backend development capability if needed (this is unclear to me), while Skyworks and Qorvo are chip-product oriented. Skyworks stock looks like a short based on this and other factors. I suspect the Broadcom / Apple announcement caused a special board meeting at Skyworks. :) Their CEO is probably in the hot seat now.
 
Last edited:
blueone said:
My understanding based on informal information channels, is that Apple is not happy about the Skyworks / Qorvo merger, and wants control over its RF designs just like it does its 5G modems. Broadcom has a major US RF fab, Skyworks has much lesser domestic fab capabilities, if any, for Apple products. A significant factor in the Broadcom deal is apparently a big expansion of the Colorado fab capacity. Also Broadcom has proven IP and backend development capability if needed (this is unclear to me), while Skyworks and Qorvo is chip-product oriented. Skyworks stock looks like a short based on this and other factors. I suspect the Broadcom / Apple announcement caused a special board meeting at Skyworks. :) Their CEO is probably in the hot seat now.
Click to expand...
So Apple is moving from Skyworks to broadcom? skyworks fabs are in the US, correct?
 
MKWVentures said:
So Apple is moving from Skyworks to broadcom? skyworks fabs are in the US, correct?
Click to expand...
The way I heard it is that Apple is looking to design its own RF chips. Broadcom is the fabrication partner. Broadcom's overall role beyond fabrication is unclear from the announcements. Skyworks and Qorvo both have fabs in the US, but I'm not sure of the details of what they do for Apple and what they farm out to other companies. The public information is that Apple was the biggest revenue customer for Qorvo and Skyworks. The rest of the story seems fuzzy.
 
Last edited:
blueone said:
The way I heard it is that Apple is looking to design its own RF chips. Broadcom is the fabrication partner. Broadcom's overall role beyond fabrication is unclear from the announcements. Skyworks and Qorvo both have fabs in the US, but I'm not sure of the details of what they do for Apple and what the farm out to other companies. The public information is that Apple was the biggest revenue customer for Qorvo and Skyworks. The rest of the story seems fuzzy.
Click to expand...
that makes sense. but the whole premise of the article that Apple is onshoring manufacturing and diversifying seems questionable. thanks for input. I do not follow RF or Skyworks very closely.
 
MKWVentures said:
that makes sense. but the whole premise of the article that Apple is onshoring manufacturing and diversifying seems questionable. thanks for input. I do not follow RF or Skyworks very closely.
Click to expand...
It's also unclear what "designing" RF chips means. It could be as little as setting specific requirements for chips for Apple, or it could go down to the analog level like Apple does for SoCs.

I know I sound like a broken record, but the popular press is useless for semiconductor news.

(I'm also surprised that in 2026 young people know exactly what a "broken record" is. We have two children who are PhD STEM scientists in the family, and both are into vinyl. Inexplicable. :( )
 
blueone said:
It's also unclear what "designing" RF chips means. It could be as little as setting specific requirements for chips for Apple, or it could go down to the analog level like Apple does for SoCs.
Click to expand...
WiFi and Bluetooth would qualify as RF chips and apple already sources both of these from Broadcomm.
 
MKWVentures said:
that makes sense. but the whole premise of the article that Apple is onshoring manufacturing and diversifying seems questionable. thanks for input. I do not follow RF or Skyworks very closely.
Click to expand...


Apple is following the industry standard operating procedure nowadays in dealing with the current administration: announcing a big number, and if Trump calls, announcing an even bigger number.

Two or three years from now, market conditions and the economy will change, and so will the administration and Apple's or many big companies' CEOs. I don't think by then most people will still remember all these big numbers.

Some of them may deliver most of what they announced, but I suspect many will change or reduce their ambitious projects.

There are no contracts to force them to deliver those numbers, or even a mechanism to validate what they have achieved.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top