Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/stmicro-ceo-sees-no-reason-to-take-part-in-eu-chip-alliance.14174/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

STMicro CEO sees no reason to take part in EU chip alliance

tonyget

Active member

PARIS (Reuters) - Franco-Italian chipmaker STMicroelectronics sees no reason to join a potential European Union semiconductors alliance, its chief executive said on Tuesday, as the European Commission is seeking to boost Europe's independence in microchips.

CEO Jean-Marc Chéry told BFM Business that the Commission's initiative is a positive development but added that his firm had no interest in taking part.

Chéry said he expects the chip shortage is not about to end. "The imbalance between demand and capacity is such that this will last at least a year," he said.

STMicro produces a wide range of chips, from low-margin microcontrollers to more sophisticated sensors used in smartphones and autonomous vehicles.

European industry chief Thierry Breton said last month there are now 22 EU member states joining forces in a new alliance to support the local production and development of semiconductors to reduce the bloc's reliance from foreign suppliers.

The European Commission's ambition is to double Europe's market share in global chips and semiconductor production from 10% to 20% by 2030.
 
The EU has STM (France/Italy), Bosch (Germany), GF (Germany), and Intel (Ireland) amongst others manufacturing semiconductors. This does not seem hard to do. What am I missing here?
 
"The European Commission's ambition is to double Europe's market share in global chips and semiconductor production from 10% to 20% by 2030."

Frankly, it's more likely to reduce further than increase. Asia is still powering ahead. China appears to have invested heavily, but so far with little to show for it. India hasn't even got started, but could become a player later. Succeeding in the semi manufacturing business these days requires - amongst other things - access to huge amounts of affordable capital, a very long term strategic view and nerves of steel to sit it out through the downturns. This no longer appeals to Wall Street (and probably hasn't for 20 years now). I don't sense the determination to see it through exists here in Europe either. We seem to prefer the instant (or faster) gratification of software activities. Not saying that's necessarily/always wrong. But it's a different mindset from making chips.
 

EU's semiconductor plan "doomed to fail", says think tank​


The European Commission's plan to make the most powerful computer chips runs the risk of wasting billions of euros, a report from German think tank Stiftung Neue Verantwortung (SNV) has warned, urging policymakers to instead focus on rebuilding the entire European chip design sector.

The report's author Jan-Peter Kleinhans said that the Commission's new goal of doubling its global share of semiconductors by 2030 was "doomed to fail" because the bloc currently lacks a "meaningful" market that an advanced chip foundry could sell into.

"For an EU foundry there is simply no business case at the moment in Europe, mainly for the lack of customers," said Kleinhans, an analyst at the Berlin-based SNV.

Last month, the Commission launched the Digital Compass, a ten-year plan aimed at producing 20% of the world's semiconductors by 2030 and constructing a fabrication plant - or fab - to produce superfast 2-nanometre chips.

The Commission's drive for a European semiconductor sector has gained in urgency in light of the continued supply chain disruptions caused by the sharp recovery in demand for products ranging from electric vehicles to smartphones, after a slump at the start of the first wave of the coronavirus one year ago.

The problem with the EU strategy, Kleinhans told Reuters in an interview, is that, unlike Asia or the US, Europe lacks a meaningful standing chip design industry that justified the cost of building a mega-fab.

"In terms of volume it's simply not enough to fill a fab," he said. "That would mean an EU foundry would need to attract foreign customers - this is extremely unlikely."

Industry leaders Samsung and TSMC have already planned investments in the US to serve chip design companies like Nvidia or Qualcomm which rely on contract chip manufacturers to produce their products.

Plans by Intel to launch its own contract manufacturing operation, beginning in the US, would add capacity and raise the question about the financial viability of an expansion of production in Europe, Kleinhans said.

Instead, the bloc should shift focus to reviving its vestigial chip design sector, he adde4d.

Of its two most recently listed "fabless" chip manufacturers, one - Dialog - has agreed to an acquisition deal by Japan's Renesas.

Last month's announcement by Apple that it was to invest €1 billion into a new semiconductor manufacturing facility in Munich, Germany, Kleinhans said, is a clear indicator of the direction in which the EU should be focusing its efforts.

"Apple has single-handedly done more for European-based chip design than the Commission in the past 10 years," he said.
 
The EU has STM (France/Italy), Bosch (Germany), GF (Germany), and Intel (Ireland) amongst others manufacturing semiconductors. This does not seem hard to do. What am I missing here?
Daniel, the usual problem as with the "Airbus of chips" in 2012.

On one hand you have the EU Commission, who sees the strategic weakness of not having advanced node capabilities in Europe but hasn't the political power of pushing for TSMC or Samsung to set up shop here. So it tries to have the EU players to go for some kind of Alliance to have a fab in Europe, capable of 2nm in 2025, without thinking of which business model would sustain it and not realising the real costs of trying to do it. If you want to look into the Commission arguments look for a document called "Digital Compass".

On the other hand you have the "Old Three", ST, IFX and NXP, (all the others are way behind in semiconductor revenue) that abandoned manufacturing at advanced nodes already more than 15 years ago, concentrating their fabs on specialty devices and relying on foundries for capacity or capability. They would like to have public support for their usual business, would hate to see money not going their way, and are not accepting to get into an Alliance aiming for advanced technologies (JM Chery was on TV but Ploss made similar comments in the press).

The EU Commission points at industry needs but forget that Europe has no major industrial player in the consumer and high performance computing/Data Centers segments which are the customers of an advanced fab. Europe industry like automotive and telecoms will require such chips but not until beyond 2025 and likely in volumes not comparable with smartphones.

The Three forget that, if they do not take this last train to start creating capacity and capability in Europe, they will miss the market increase for the logic complement to their specialty chips and also move more and more of their microcontrollers, where they still are largely present, to foundries . In doing so they take the risk of losing the last differentiator they have to fabless and foundries and lose even more market share to them.

The irony is that one of the argument used to say thet EU do not need an advanced fab is that there is no market in Europe for advanced technology. It is true today, but implying that such fab should be only to fit local demand and not competing to capture part of the increasing market worldwide shows that the ongoing thinking in the industry and some policymakers is more like landowners than industrialists.

And then you have the most successful semi company in Europe, ASML, who competes worldwide with revenue superior to any of the Three and profits superior to the sum of the Three, which is the best supply chain chokepoint for any political negotiation by Europe, but that is not politically protected and has is export policy dictated by the US.....

In reality the overall issue of the supply chain behind the digitalisation of the economy, from raw materials to Data Centers, is a very complex one, with interdependencies and weak points all over. Unfortunately nobody seems to want to address it in a rational way and decision makers prefer posturing, which get even more ridiculous when the discussion move from the specialists to the general public press.

In medio stat virtus.
 
Back
Top