Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/i-would-like-to-know-the-approach-using-by-tsmc-samsung-intel-for-sadp-process.9299/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

I would like to know the approach using by tsmc , samsung , intel for SADP process ?

chowdaiah04

New member
For lower nodes like 10nm and 7nm , foundries are using SADP process for processing of Mx layers . I would like to know what is the approach
using by tsmc/samsung/intel for these SADP layers ?

The various approaches are 1. Traditional SID-SADP (Block Mask) 2. Mandrel Fill/Cut Mask SID-SADP 3. SIM SADP .


Thanks,
Naga.
 
Chances are the foundries could start with LE3 for this year's newest nodes, but GlobalFoundries did publish an SPIE 2017 paper (Exploiting Regularity: Breakthroughs in Sub-7nm Place-and-Route) where they could design SAQP-friendly layouts, i.e., one (193i) cut mask at metal level. IMEC also has a paper (Low Track Height Standard cell Design in iN7 using Scaling Boosters) on low track height (6 and 6.5 track) cells, which are SAQP-friendly.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top